The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has announced that it has requested a review of data already collected to assess the possibility of a new search for flight MH370.
what happened to Flight MH370 From Malaysia Airlines, but above all, where are the remains of the plane carrying 239 people on board that departed from Kuala Lumpur and headed to Beijing on March 8, 2014? These are the questions that many have been talking about for years now and to which perhaps the first answers can come by now. Nearly eight years after the disappearance of a plane whose remains have not been found despite several years of searching, Australian aviation safety investigators have released New data review software It has already been collected through previous research to determine if there are opportunities for another research expedition at sea.
Last week, in fact, Australian Transport Safety Bureau The ATSB announced that it had requested a review of data collected during the 2017 investigation, although it has not yet recommended new research on the aircraft. “The Australian Transport Safety Office has not been formally involved in any search for the missing MH370 since the conclusion of the first underwater search in 2017,” he said in a statement, making it clear that the final decision on the new search rests with the authorities and policy. However, the opening is not a small matter as it follows and is linked to another announcement, that of British aeronautical engineer Richard Godfrey, who claims to have located the crash site using revolutionary technology and identification The search point is in the Indian Ocean, about two thousand kilometers west of Perth With the wreckage of flight MH370 that could fall to a depth of 4,000 metres.
As explained by ATSB President Angus Mitchell, Mr. Godfrey’s work has been carefully studied and led to Decision to review the data already collected. The location identified by Mr. Godfrey was not in the original search area identified by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in 2015, but falls within the expanded search area for subsequent search. “When the ATSB was informed that the area indicated by Mr. Godfrey included a perimeter area surveyed during the ATSB-led search, for due diligence, the ATSB requested Geoscience Australia to review its data from the search to re-check that there were no items of interest,” Mitchell explained. It should take a few weeks and lead to a final report on which new research will be determined.
“Infuriatingly humble social media ninja. Devoted travel junkie. Student. Avid internet lover.”
